|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Two Owl Bob writes: |
I quite like FoG and have played in a homebrew condensed version a fair bit but without an official condensed version I just can't get anyone else in my group interested. We have got used to having at least half a dozen small but interesting armies for Double DBA or BBDBA and going back to having one or maybe two very large armies just doesn't appeal any more. |
Back to the Homepage
1,188 hits since 31 Aug 2009
©1994-2012 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
playing it regularly | 21 | 8% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
gone back to prior ruleset | 16 | 6% | |
undecided about FoG | 10 | 4% | |
haven't tried FoG yet | 115 | 42% | |
something newer has come along | 2 | 1% | |
not interested in Ancients | 19 | 7% | |
haven't played FoG enough to judge | 13 | 5% | |
playing FoG occasionally | 10 | 4% | |
I buy the supplements just to read | 4 | 1% | |
needs too many figures | 8 | 3% | |
still putting together an army | 6 | 2% | |
the rules are boring | 19 | 7% | |
combat system too much of a chore | 15 | 5% | |
takes too long for a game | 3 | 1% | |
too abstract | 0 | 0% | |
other | 15 | 5% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Nom de Guerre wonders... FoG has been around for over a year now. It was hyped up to the hilt, had the backing of the mighty Osprey, and applied GW/FoW slick presentation to Ancients rules. It'd be interesting to find out what impact it has had on Ancients gamers after a year. (Poll options taken from this discussion.) |
