|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ianrs54 writes: |
least I can understand FOG. |
Back to the Homepage
1,396 hits since 25 Sep 2009
©1994-2012 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
yes | 98 | 39% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
no | 44 | 17% | |
abstain | 110 | 44% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
In the Letters column of Slingshot magazine, Phil Barker describes Field of Glory as: ...a rule set designed by a small clique as a stylised competition game using toy soldiers, rather than as a game in which players complete by demonstrating the abilities of a real life general in a real world in which men get tired, horses get hungry, the sun and moon rise and set, and weather changes with the climate and seasons, armies get disorganised and players feel the excitement of a real battle. Is FoG primarily a "stylized competition game"? |
