|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| unknown member writes: |
I rated it fairly high (surprise, surprise). I think you can get lots of movement and some very interesting dilemmas. I find that 2 Divisions to a Corps per player is the best. |
Back to the Homepage
862 hits since 9 May 2009
©1994-2012 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
The Membership System is temporarily offline for maintenance. It should be restored shortly.
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
10 | 4 | 2% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
9 | 5 | 3% | |
8 | 17 | 9% | |
7 | 6 | 3% | |
6 | 4 | 2% | |
5 | 10 | 5% | |
4 | 5 | 3% | |
3 | 1 | 1% | |
2 | 0 | 0% | |
1 | 3 | 2% | |
haven't played them | 73 | 40% | |
never heard of them | 29 | 16% | |
not a Napoleonics gamer | 27 | 15% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
In a recent Miniature Wargames article, Bob Loade selected Age of Eagles for a refight of Austerlitz: The rules are produced to a high standard and well laid out. After a couple of small games, most players will get a good handle on the rule set and really enjoy them. On a scale of 1 (poor) to 10 (great), how would you rate Age of Eagles? |
