|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Brother Tiberius writes: |
As a relative new comer to miniature wargaming, I'd like to see more "points" in my battle report. I wouldn't expect the battle report to make me an expert player, only time pushing miniatures around will do that, but I think I could be exposed to examples of play and tactics that I would not ordinarily see in my local gaming area. That is a worthwhile thing, because it exposes new ideas to people that are newer to the hobby. |
Back to the Homepage
1,970 hits since 14 Jul 2004
©1994-2012 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
yes - should have a point | 108 | 33% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
no - just description is OK | 183 | 55% | |
no opinion | 40 | 12% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
In Fanatic Magazine issue 1, Jervis Johnson writes: ...if there is one thing that all battle reports have, it's the description of the battle. However...a battle report is also a magazine article, and magazine articles really need to have a point. To put this another way, a good battle report needs to illustrate a specific point, not just be the description of the game that was played. Do you agree? |
