|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Martin Rapier  writes: |
Yes, go for a month, if no one has been offended in that time it really can't be a big deal. |
Back to the Homepage
1,331 hits since 4 Apr 2008
©1994-2012 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
1 month old | 107 | 42% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
2 months old | 14 | 6% | |
3 months old | 30 | 12% | |
6 months old | 18 | 7% | |
9 months old | 1 | 0% | |
1 year old | 13 | 5% | |
2 years old | 4 | 2% | |
there should be no time limit | 46 | 18% | |
no opinion | 19 | 8% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Imagine that a complaint is received about a forum post which violates forum rules, but the post was made some time ago. The poster should receive no Dawghouse punishment if the post is at least... |
