|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frederick  writes: |
Agree with Jeremy and John – I voted "follower" because usually someone else sets up the games, umpires, etc – but, for ACW or Colonial, I bring the minis, umpire the game, etc (partially because I about the only local member of the group with those armies) |
Back to the Homepage
901 hits since 16 Aug 2008
©1994-2012 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
I'm a leader | 80 | 49% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
I'm a follower | 31 | 19% | |
I don't have a wargaming group | 50 | 31% | |
I'm not a wargamer | 1 | 1% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Writing in The Heliograph #160, Gordon Andrews tells how he was compelled into a new period by another gamer in his wargaming group: ...he is probably one of the most dedicated gamers I have ever known. Once he settles on a particular genre for gaming there is no turning him back. The Boxer Rebellion era was to prove to be one of his grand obsessions and as usual he would involve our entire group in the project... In your wargaming group, are you the one who leads the way into new periods and genres, or are you one of those who supports the leader? |
