|
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS |
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
I use casualty figures | 127 | 25% |  |
|---|
casualties are part of war | 101 | 20% | |
|---|
it's gruesome | 1 | 0% | |
|---|
I have no problem with it | 258 | 50% | |
|---|
it's not my thing | 26 | 5% | |
|---|
| POLL DESCRIPTION |
Some rules encourage the use of casualty figures - miniatures representing dead (or sometimes wounded) soldiers. This is sometimes done to mark the location of bodies (which become obstacles on the tabletop). For other games, casualties are a way of tracking a unit's losses or morale state.
Opponents of casualty figures feel that it's wrong to use figures representing dead bodies.
How do you feel about casualty figures? |
I use casualty figures | I use casualty figures in my gaming, and find nothing wrong with them.
|
|---|
casualties are part of war | Casualties should be represented on the tabletop, or else you are making war too clean and antiseptic.
|
|---|
it's gruesome | I find it distasteful to have "dead" figures on the tabletop.
|
|---|
I have no problem with it | I have no objection to casualty figures.
|
|---|
it's not my thing | I don't think I'll ever use casualty figures.
|
|---|
|
