|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How about this option: Used to play WFB, got tired of getting screwed, so moved on to other games, in which I do ustilize scenarios quite often, since the mission objective is the point of a battle. It sums up my feelings quite nicely, thanks! |
Back to the Homepage
898 hits since 15 Feb 2009
©1994-2012 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
100% of the time | 11 | 6% | |
|---|---|---|---|
90% of the time | 7 | 4% | |
80% of the time | 5 | 3% | |
70% of the time | 5 | 3% | |
60% of the time | 0 | 0% | |
50% of the time | 6 | 3% | |
40% of the time | 5 | 3% | |
30% of the time | 2 | 1% | |
20% of the time | 7 | 4% | |
10% of the time | 8 | 5% | |
never | 15 | 9% | |
not a Warhammer player | 103 | 59% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Writing in White Dwarf magazine, Andy Hall declares: Warhammer has always been about letting your imagination run riot, and enacting exciting stories on the tabletop. You'll find many such tales in your regular games, but to really have a story that the bards will sing for years to come or be recorded in the annals of history then your best bet is to create your own scenario. How often do you play Warhammer scenarios that you or your opponent have designed, rather than scenarios from the rulebooks or magazine? |