|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Lentulus  writes: |
If you look at the period of the early ironclad, not just the ACW, there are so many fascinating combination of ships around the world that the temptation to create imaginary scenarios to try them out is pretty strong. I was in a group that did imaginary wars with 1880s period ships, and there was a lot of fun to be had. |
Back to the Homepage
884 hits since 29 Aug 2009
©1994-2012 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
prefer historical scenarios | 16 | 8% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
prefer fictional scenarios | 28 | 14% | |
no preference | 109 | 54% | |
not interested in this period | 49 | 24% | |
not a gamer | 1 | 0% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
A recent issue of Miniature Wargames magazine included Dire Straits Off Savannah, a scenario concerning a Union raid against blockade-runners in the harbor. The author said that the scenario "...was all mine - not based on anything historical just something I thought of." For your ACW-era naval wargames, do you prefer to play strictly historical scenarios, or do you enjoy fictional "what if?" scenarios? |
