|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 the Gorb  writes: |
I have been involed in a fantasy campaign that has played annually for 32 years. There are 'good' factions, 'evil' factions and 'neutral' factions. The 'good' buy lists are fixed. The 'evil' buy lists are fixed. The 'neutral' buy lists cause a variance from year to year based on whichever side they decide to support that year. Regards, the Gorb |
Back to the Homepage
1,473 hits since 14 Nov 2006
©1994-2012 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
Option 1 | 82 | 43% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
Option 2 | 69 | 36% | |
no preference | 30 | 16% | |
no opinion | 10 | 5% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Germy Bugger wonders: I guess this would be for non-historical games really, but given the choice which do you prefer? My thoughts are Option 1 gives more scope for giving an army a set feel. It also makes it quick and easy to build armies. But Option 2 is more realistic - if there is no argument to say who an army might buy its equipment from. | |
Option 1 | Set army lists for each faction. Listing units only that race can use.
|
|---|---|
Option 2 | A list of units that the player can choose from to form whatever army they like.
|
