|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| BravoX writes: |
I don't get it, in what way is that out of context? |
Back to the Homepage
875 hits since 27 Mar 2009
©1994-2012 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
yes - too fragile | 4 | 3% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
no - just be careful | 17 | 11% | |
no - not fragile | 11 | 7% | |
haven't put them on the game table yet | 25 | 16% | |
don't know | 97 | 63% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Writing in Ancient Warfare magazine, reviewer Ed Haines credits Warlord Games' Roman artillery models* as being "fantastically fine and detailed replicas of the war machines," then predicts they will be "fragile for gaming." Do you find the models too fragile? * Ed is reviewing the large ballista and two scorpions from the Roman artillery boxed set. |
