|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Patrick Sexton  writes: |
"I have always favored the bastinado over flogging. And the strapado." Defenestration is quicker. ( I have dated several women that also liked the strapado but that is a story for a different day.) |
Back to the Homepage
2,099 hits since 22 Aug 2005
©1994-2012 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
should be much more restrictive | 72 | 21% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
should be more restrictive | 67 | 20% | |
should be a little more restrictive | 49 | 14% | |
fine as it is | 104 | 30% | |
should be a little less restrictive | 2 | 1% | |
should be less restrictive | 0 | 0% | |
should be a lot less restrictive | 3 | 1% | |
no opinion | 24 | 7% | |
not familiar with the Dawghouse | 20 | 6% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Writing on the forums, Tshannon mused: I'm beginning to think that those that are DHed should be truly 'in the cooler'. That is to say, it should be a cooling off period for those so incarcerated. If they can 'complain' and 'stifle', I personally think that they shouldn't be able to do either. If it's easily possible, they shouldn't even be able to access the site as far as I'm concerned. I forward this position on the premise that some do not take a DHing as a real punishment. Some even seem to take it as a badge of honor and look at the whole process as a form of entertainment. Should the Dawghouse be more restrictive than it currently is? |
