|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| rddfxx writes: |
The author of the uniform book is responsible for accuracy in the photos. There seems to be a theme here that the author of the uniform guide will defer to the judgement of the re-enactors. Rather, the author/editor/art director should cherry pick the reenactors to be featured and the best shots of those re-enactors. I know it sometimes don't always work, but if the author doesn't know his stuff, it doesn't matter if the guide uses photos of re-enactors, commissioned illustrations, or Larry Leadhead cutouts, it won't be a very good guide. |
Back to the Homepage
1,898 hits since 27 Mar 2005
©1994-2012 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
definitely | 121 | 32% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
probably | 92 | 24% | |
maybe | 66 | 17% | |
probably not | 53 | 14% | |
definitely not | 29 | 8% | |
no opinion | 18 | 5% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Several recent uniform books have provided, in addition to the usual period photographs or artwork, photographs of re-enactors as references. Do you feel that using photographs of modern re-enactors should be encouraged in uniform publications? |
