|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scourtien writes: |
I guess reenactors are like any other wargamer some are pains some are fine. |
Back to the Homepage
1,695 hits since 6 Nov 2007
©1994-2012 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
yes - very good | 25 | 6% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
yes - good | 28 | 7% | |
yes - OK | 52 | 13% | |
not sure | 111 | 27% | |
no - not really | 65 | 16% | |
no - bad | 13 | 3% | |
no - very bad | 18 | 4% | |
don't know any reenactors | 98 | 24% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
On another forum, a wargamer says that while he enjoys watching reenactments, he dislikes gaming with reenactors. "I had one group of them begin to question every mechanic in my game, spouting off about march rates, loading times, statistical accuracy of musket fire, smoke density on a field, etc." Do reenactors make good wargamers? |
