Help support TMP


"US Goal: 100K artillery shells per month" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

FUBAR


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Cheap Buys: Revell's Lowriders

As the holiday season approaches, overstock toys of previous years show up in the dollar stores.


461 hits since 24 Apr 2024
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian24 Apr 2024 12:06 p.m. PST

…"With the supplemental that just thankfully passed last night, we'll be at 100,000 rounds by next summer," Lt. Gen. James Mingus said at an event hosted by think-tank CSIS.

That's more than three times the 30,000 shells that the service's factories are expected to turn out this month, he said, and will represent a sixfold increase since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022…

Defense One: link

Wackmole924 Apr 2024 12:45 p.m. PST

in 16 months? We are so not the Arsonal of Democary anymore.

Micman Supporting Member of TMP24 Apr 2024 1:09 p.m. PST

Totally different time. If we saw Putin as Hitler was viewed in 1940s then I would be concerned over the response. We are not on a war footing, we have put more national effort to post 911 than Russia vs Ukraine.

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP24 Apr 2024 1:54 p.m. PST

We'd better be getting on a war footing. China, Russia and Iran are out there. Biden is no FDR.

Nine pound round24 Apr 2024 3:47 p.m. PST

Even FDR wasn't the FDR he is often thought to be. The US didn't start serious rearmament until 1940, and we were nowhere near ready when Pearl Harbor happened. The biggest reason that the war took three and a half years to finish after the US joined was that the first two were needed just to build up, organize and train sufficient forces to take down Germany and Japan.

James Richardson's "On the Treadmill to Pearl Harbor" is a worthwhile account; Richardson was embittered after his relief by Roosevelt, but he wasn't wrong to assert that the buildup wasn't as fast as it needed to be.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.