Help support TMP


"The Swedish Brigade. How did it operate?" Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Renaissance Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Renaissance

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Tactica Medieval Rulebook


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Battle-Market: Tannenberg 1410

The Editor tries out a boardgame - yes, a boardgame - from battle-market magazine.


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article

Report from Bayou Wars 2006

The Editor heads for Vicksburg...


545 hits since 14 Mar 2024
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Elenderil14 Mar 2024 11:17 a.m. PST

Probably been done to death already, and I'm guessing that the answer is no one knows for sure.

Looking at the deployment of the three and four squadron brigades used between 1621 and 1632 the period illustrations show musket behind the front most pike block. The two flanking pike blocks have musket along side. The flanking musket can engage the enemy but the block behind the lead pike block can't. This seems wrong as a large part of the brigades firepower can't be brought into action.

So the question is how did the brigade operate in practice.

Elenderil14 Mar 2024 11:19 a.m. PST

Arghhh! Admin please delete duplicates

Daniel S14 Mar 2024 12:27 p.m. PST

The brigade formation is not static, the period illustrations just show the basic formation that is the starting point. Once the brigade is in action each of the squadrons will adopt one of 6 formations based on the requirements of the situation.(? I think it was 6 but my memory is not good after the stroke and I'm away from my reference library at the moment.)

So the actual formation in the middle of a battle could and would look quite different from the classic images. For example we know from Imperial accounts that at Lutzen at least one brigade advanced with all of their musketeers covered behind the pikemen.

The problem was of course that coordinating 3-4 battalion sized units and their formations was a lot of work and while it could allow for excellent flexibility and performance it did require a lot of training and experience. Turned out that simpler formations were a lot more soldier proof as they could be used effectively with less well trained officers and men. The loss in effectiveness and flexibility was acceptable, particularly when you consider that the same officers and men formed into Swedish Brigades would have performed worse.

Travellera15 Mar 2024 1:36 a.m. PST

Great to see that you are back Daniel!

Elenderil15 Mar 2024 2:04 a.m. PST

Daniel S this is pretty much what I suspected thank you for the reply.

On a separate note I'm sorry to hear you have had a stroke but I'm very happy to see you are still in the land of the living! A fair number of us here on TMP have been worried about your health and have missed your contributions on the Swedish Army.

If you feel up to it (and are not bound by contract) at some point I'd be very interested in knowing more about the six formations. Sources for this level of detail seem sadly lacking in English (unless you know of some worth purchasing)

Griefbringer15 Mar 2024 3:32 a.m. PST

I cannot really comment on the details of the Swedish brigade, but I am also happy to hear that Daniel S is still around.

DFLange Supporting Member of TMP15 Mar 2024 10:56 a.m. PST

Welcome back, Daniel.

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP15 Mar 2024 12:07 p.m. PST

Sorry to hear about your illness but glad to see you posting again Daniel S. We English speaking TYW guys always look forward to your contributions.

Ryan T15 Mar 2024 3:20 p.m. PST

Daniel, it's good to see you back here in the ranks of TMP.

Elenderil, at least a partial answer to your question can be found on page 97 of André Schürger's dissertation, The archaeology of the Battle of Lützen: an examination of 17th century military material culture, (University of Glasgow, 2015).

A link to a PDF of the paper can be found here:

link

As well, in the listing of "Figures and Tables" check out Figures 14 and 16.

Elenderil17 Mar 2024 3:05 p.m. PST

Ryan T funnily enough I found that document via a google search and very useful it is too.

Mollinary17 Mar 2024 4:00 p.m. PST

Welcome back Daniel, we have really missed you!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.