Help support TMP


"Why did Russia Veto the United Nations Resolution Concerning" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

FUBAR


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


473 hits since 2 May 2024
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0102 May 2024 12:36 p.m. PST

… Nuclear Weapons in Outer Space?


"In April 2024, "Russia cast the only vote against the draft resolution that reaffirmed provisions in the Outer Space Treaty prohibiting the placement of nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in space." The vetoed resolution had been approved by the U.N.'s Fourth Committee. (The Fourth Committee is one of the main six committees of the U.N. General Assembly. It is tasked with, among other things, issues dealing with space.) This veto was particularly significant because the proposed resolution was the arms control equivalent of motherhood and apple pie. Thus, something incredibly significant must have driven such a decision.


Putin is increasingly behaving like a rogue state leader, thumbing his nose at the international community. Russian has historically supported arms control that is both ill-defined and largely unverifiable, but the Russian veto to the reaffirmation of a 1967 Treaty goes beyond this. Putin's diplomacy is becoming increasingly thuggish, reflecting the viciousness of his war against Ukraine and his disdain for Western values…"

Main page


link

Armand

SBminisguy02 May 2024 2:32 p.m. PST

What a weird spin! The USSR, and then Russia, never liked Arms Control Treaties very much unless they constrained the US/West MORE than it did them. That is to say:

1. IF Russia feels the US capabilities in an area are more advanced or developed, THEN they will want a treaty to stall US progress while they catch-up with hard to detect and hard to enforce treaty violations.

2. IF Russia feels that US capabilities in an area lag behind Russian capabilities or it's critically strategic that Russia not be constrained, THEN Russia will block arms control efforts.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP02 May 2024 4:07 p.m. PST

Some may be up there already. Or other such weapons, i.e. "Rods from God" …

Cuprum202 May 2024 9:04 p.m. PST

All necessary agreements already exist. Any weapon, not just nuclear, has long been prohibited in space:

link

Nebenzya spoke well at the UN about who, where and when violated the concluded agreements:

link

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.